Studio 107 vs Sitebulb: Bespoke Website in Days Comparison

Sitebulb is a website auditing platform. Studio 107 is a studio that ships five single-purpose marketing tools. On the surface, they're different animals—but if you're comparing them, you're likely weighing up whether to build a bespoke website in days using automation, or audit your way to a better site. Let's be direct: they solve different problems.

What does 'bespoke website in days' actually mean?

When people talk about a bespoke website in days, they usually mean one of two things. First, there's the promise of AI-assisted builders that claim to ship custom websites faster than traditional design workflows. Second, there's the reality of actually needing a site that looks intentional, performs well, and doesn't feel templated—all without a six-week discovery phase.

Sitebulb leans into diagnosis. It crawls your site, flags technical issues, reports on structure, and gives you a roadmap of what to fix. It's a tool for understanding what's broken.

Studio 107's answer to this problem is Sitewright Studio—a fixed-price, AI-assisted website builder that genuinely ships bespoke websites in days. You brief it, it builds it, you own it. Different paradigm entirely.

If you're trying to build something new, these tools operate in different lanes.

Studio 107 vs Sitebulb: Core feature breakdown

Sitebulb's strengths:

• Page crawl audits with deep technical reporting (crawl budget, redirect chains, orphaned pages, structured data)
• Visual sitemaps and visualisation of site structure
• Comparison mode (old vs new, live vs staging)
• API access for integrations
• Desktop app option
• Extensive SEO-focused reporting (Core Web Vitals, mobile usability, schema markup)

Studio 107's Sitewright Studio:

• AI-assisted design and build (you don't code, don't design, don't brief endlessly)
• Fixed price, transparent timeline
• Ownership of the codebase (no vendor lock-in)
• Built on modern, lightweight stack
• Includes initial SEO setup
• Handoff support to your dev team if needed

Here's the honest bit: if you need a detailed technical audit of an existing site, Sitebulb is purpose-built for that. Sitewright Studio is for when you're starting from zero or rebuilding, and you want it done in weeks, not months.

The marketing stack angle:

Sitebulb is a one-tool wonder—it does one job and does it well. But if you're trying to simplify your marketing stack, it's a single point of focus that doesn't talk to much else without an API integration. It's a reporting silo.

Studio 107 is built differently. Rather than forcing you into a bundle, we ship five products, each bought independently. If you need Sitewright Studio for your website, you're not forced to buy Clkly (our CRM) or Ember Social (our social planner) or UtilitySEO (our SEO platform). You pick what you actually use. For agencies scaling fast, this modularity matters—you're not paying for bloat.

How Studio 107 keeps your marketing stack lean (no bloat, no bundles)

Most platform vendors want you locked in. Buy one tool, get a discount if you commit to three more, suddenly you're managing five products you'll never fully use.

Studio 107's model flips this. Every product is priced separately. Clkly (branded links, email sequences, trigger workflows, lightweight CRM) is £29/month if you want it alone. Atelio (AI product photography and content calendar) is £49/month if that's all you need. You're not bundled. You're not oversold.

This is especially useful for agencies and solopreneurs who are tired of "talk to sales" conversations. No complexity tiers. No hidden features locked behind enterprise plans. Every product has a free plan that genuinely works.

Compare that to Sitebulb, which requires a subscription to unlock the full feature set. There's a free tier (limited crawls), but depth requires paid access. Fair enough for a technical tool—but it's still a single-purpose platform you're adding to your stack.

If you're trying to build marketing tools that work and actually integrate with your workflow, the Studio 107 approach saves you from the "Swiss Army knife bloat" problem. You get specialist tools instead.

Which platform works better for agencies scaling fast?

Agencies have different needs at different stages.

Early stage (under 5 team members): You need automation without complexity. Clkly handles outreach, link tracking, and basic sequences. Sitewright Studio handles website builds. You're shipping faster because you're not stuck in design cycles. Sitebulb would be useful for client audits, but if budget's tight, you're probably auditing in-house with Screaming Frog or a manual checklist.

Scaling stage (5–15 team members): Now you're juggling multiple clients and multiple domains. Sitewright Studio (bespoke website in days) becomes a selling point—you can offer custom builds without the overhead. Clkly's email sequences and workflows free up a person who'd otherwise be doing manual outreach. Sitebulb's reporting becomes more valuable if you're offering managed SEO services. Some agencies use both: Sitebulb for audit reporting, Clkly for client outreach and follow-up automation.

Mature stage (15+ team members): You likely have a tech stack already. Sitebulb slots in as a reporting tool. Studio 107's products integrate more easily into modular stacks (you pick what you use, not a forced bundle). Platform vendors like HubSpot or Salesforce would be your CRM backbone at this point—but if you're lightweight and bootstrapped, Studio 107 keeps costs predictable.

The honest answer: Sitebulb is better for technical auditing. Studio 107 is better for keeping your stack lean and shipping fast without tooling overhead.

Pricing and free plans: What you actually get

Sitebulb:

• Free tier: 1 website, max 250 pages per crawl, limited reports
• Paid tiers: Starter (monthly crawls), Professional (weekly crawls), Agency (unlimited crawls, team features)
• Pricing is per team, not per user
• No "freemium" in the sense that free is genuinely limited

Studio 107 (Sitewright Studio):

• Fixed price for bespoke website in days (transparent, no surprise costs)
• No ongoing subscription—you pay once, you own it
• Free tier exists for other products (Clkly, Atelio, UtilitySEO, Ember Social) with no time limit, genuinely usable
• Pro tiers are modest (£29–£99/month per product)

If you're cost-conscious, Studio 107's model wins: you pay for what you use, nothing more. Sitebulb requires a subscription if you're auditing regularly.

For agencies, the maths is simpler with Studio 107: fixed website cost, modular tool costs, no locked bundles.

Which tool should you choose next?

Pick Sitebulb if:

• You're auditing existing websites regularly (your own or clients')
• You need detailed technical reporting on crawl health, structure, and Core Web Vitals
• Your workflow already lives in other platforms (you just need audit output)
• You're doing SEO consulting and need granular data to show clients

Pick Studio 107 if:

• You're building new websites and want them done in weeks, not months
• You want marketing tools that don't force a bundle (you pick what you use)
• You're tired of "talk to sales" conversations and want transparent pricing
• You need a combination of website building + outreach + link tracking + content planning
• You want to simplify your marketing stack instead of adding more tools

The real differentiator isn't Sitebulb vs Studio 107—it's diagnosis vs. ship. Sitebulb tells you what's wrong. Marketing tools for agencies built with the Studio 107 philosophy get things done, fast, without the bloat.

If you're starting a new project and need a bespoke website in days alongside outreach automation, Studio 107 is your bet. If you're auditing existing infrastructure, Sitebulb is the specialist. And honestly, smart agencies use both—Sitebulb for reporting, Studio 107 for everything else.